Senior Advocate Abhishek Manu Singhvi argued before the Constitution Bench that Public Interest Litigations (PILs) cannot be permitted to become a vehicle for interpreting religious practices or alleging their violation by public authorities. He stressed that allowing such an approach would fundamentally distort the constitutional scheme governing religious freedoms under Articles 25 and 26. Emphasising judicial restraint, … Continue reading PIL Cannot Be Used to Judge Religious Practices; Threshold Must Be ‘Ten Times Higher’: Sr Adv Abhishek Singhvi to Supreme Court