Senior Advocate Madhavi Divan argued for the review petitioners in Sabarimala Reference before a 9-judge Bench. Cautioning against adopting a restrictive interpretation of “religious denomination,” she argued that such an approach risks diluting fundamental rights under the Constitution. She submitted that courts have increasingly treated limitations as central, rather than the rights themselves. “Instead of … Continue reading [Sabarimala Reference Day-9] ‘Tick-the-box’ Approach to Determine Denomination will Result in Polarisation: Sr Adv Madhvi Divan