Senior Advocate Rajeev Dhavan, appearing in the Sabarimala review proceedings before the Supreme Court, argued that the adjudication of religious freedom under Articles 25 and 26 cannot be left to a “case-by-case” determination, urging the Court to lay down clear and consistent constitutional principles. Opening his submissions, Sr Adv Dhavan referred to the framework outlined … Continue reading [Sabarimala Review] “Religious Freedom Cannot Be Decided Case-by-Case: Sr Adv Rajeev Dhavan