Senior Advocate M.R. Venkatesh, appearing in the Sabarimala review proceedings, argued before the Supreme Court that key constitutional expressions such as “religious practice” under Article 25 and “religious denomination” under Article 26 are inherently indeterminate and incapable of precise definition, cautioning against rigid judicial interpretation. Opening his submissions, Sr Adv Venkatesh contended that the concept … Continue reading [Sabarimala Review] “Religious Practice” and “Denomination” Are Indeterminate; Warns Against Expanding State Control Under Article 25(2): Sr Adv M.R. Venkatesh