loader image

Supreme Court Quashes FIRs Against Samay Raina & Others in ‘India’s Got Latent’ Controversial Remarks

Supreme Court Quashes FIRs Against Samay Raina & Others in ‘India’s Got Latent’ Controversial Remarks

Ranveer Gautam Allahabadia v. Union of India & Ors., W.P.(C) No. 83/2025; Ashish Anil Chanchlani v. State of Guwahati & Anr., W.P.(Crl.) No. 85/2025; and Cure SMA Foundation of India v. Union of India & Ors., W.P.(C) No. 460/2025 [Order dated August 14, 2026]

Supreme Court Quashes India’s Got Latent FIRs

The Supreme Court on Friday quashed the FIRs and consequential proceedings against comedian Samay Raina and fellow content creators Vipul Goyal, Balraj Paramjeet Singh Ghai, Sonali Thakar alias Sonali Aditya Desai and Nishant Jagdish Tanwar in connection with the controversial remarks made on the YouTube show India’s Got Latent, after noting the respondents’ efforts to engage with the petitioner NGO and undertake initiatives to raise awareness and support for persons suffering from Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA).

A Bench comprising CJI Surya Kant, Justice Joymalya Bagchi and Justice V. Mohana was hearing the connected petitions arising from the controversy over objectionable remarks made during India’s Got Latent episode, including mocking of persons suffering from rare genetic conditions like Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA).

Chief Justice Surya Kant, Justice Joymalya Bagchi and Justice V. Mohana

Also Read: India’s Got Latent Controversy: SC Imposes ₹3 Lakh Costs on Samay Raina for Failing to Comply With Disability Awareness Direction

Counsel informed the Bench that following the Court’s earlier directions, genuine efforts had been made by the parties to engage with each other and that discussions were underway to develop further initiatives. The Court welcomed the progress, with CJI Surya Kant observing:

“We are quite sure that once there are genuine efforts the positive results are bound to be there. It will have a very positive impact.”

The Court recorded the respondents’ submission that they had organised a chess tournament for persons with disabilities from March 14 to 16, 2026, which received widespread media coverage and helped create awareness about organisations working for persons with disabilities, including SMA. The event also generated donations for organisations working for persons with disabilities.

The respondents submitted that they had also scheduled four additional shows for fundraising. However, logistical difficulties prevented them from making specific arrangements to invite persons with disabilities to those events. They have now expressed willingness to invite persons suffering from SMA and provide financial support.

The Court also noted the progress made through the constructive dialogue between the respondents and the Cure SMA Foundation regarding programmes aimed at spreading awareness about SMA and celebrating the lives and achievements of persons living with the condition.

The Court consequently quashed the FIRs registered against Respondents and set aside all consequential proceedings, while noting that the petitioner NGO had agreed to accept the amount deposited by the respondents for utilisation towards one of its causes.