loader image

Bombay HC Quashes BMC Notices Seeking Private Land for Proposed 12.20-Metre Road

Bombay HC Quashes BMC Notices Seeking Private Land for Proposed 12.20-Metre Road

Newkem Products Corporation v. Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai, Decided on 11.06.2026

Bombay High Court

The Bombay High Court has quashed BMC notices seeking possession of Newkem Products Corporation’s private land at Bhandup for widening Aatmaram Bhoir Marg and creating a connector between Gamdevi Road and Lake Road.

A Bench comprising Acting Chief Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge and Justice Gautam A. Ankhad held that while Sections 297 and 299 of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act empower the Municipal Commissioner to prescribe a regular street line and take possession of land falling within it, these provisions could not be invoked to acquire the petitioners’ private land in the present case.

The Court noted that the portion sought to be acquired was not an existing road but formed an integral part of the petitioners’ factory, which they had possessed since 1957. The proposed acquisition would substantially affect the factory by separating its stores, canteen, administrative area and discharge facilities, besides affecting loading and unloading operations and existing gas and electrical infrastructure.

Also Read Delhi HC Grants Ex-Parte Injunction to Allcargo Logistics, Orders Suspension of Rogue Websites Infringing ‘GATI’ Trademark

The Bench further observed that the proposed connector would save only about 400 metres, while the existing road was already heavily encroached upon and was less than six metres wide at several places despite being sanctioned as a 9.15-metre road. It found no material showing that efforts had been made to restore the existing road width.

Finding merit in the petitioners’ contention that the exercise may have been initiated at the instance of a nearby developer seeking additional connectivity, the Court held that the statutory powers under Sections 297 and 299 cannot be extended to such an exercise.

The Court accordingly quashed the July 5, 2024 and April 1, 2025 notices insofar as they sought possession of the petitioners’ land between points C and D.

Appearances

For the Petitioners: Mr. Dinyar Madon, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Bhavik Lalan, Mr. Priyansh R. Jain, Mr. Punit Agrawal and Mr. Dhruv Dedhia, Advocates.

For the Respondent–MCGM: Mr. Girish Godbole, Senior Advocate, with Ms. Sheetal Metakari, Advocate.

For the Applicant–Intervenor in IA(L)/2562/2026: Mr. Saket Mone with Mr. Raghav Paneja, Advocates, instructed by Vidhi Partners.

PDF Icon

Newkem Products Corporation v. Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai

Preview PDF