The Supreme Court on Tuesday reserved its verdict in a batch of petitions challenging the requirement of three years’ practice at the Bar as a prerequisite for recruitment to the post of Civil Judge (Junior Division). The Court also permitted the Karnataka High Court to withdraw its recruitment notification and issue a fresh advertisement in accordance with law.
A Bench comprising Chief Justice Surya Kant, Justice Augustine George Masih and Justice K. Vinod Chandran heard the matters. During the hearing, the Court allowed the intervention application, permitting the Karnataka High Court to withdraw its Civil Judge recruitment advertisement and issue a fresh notification in accordance with law.
Also Read: Supreme Court Flags Gender Impact of Three-Year Bar Practice Rule for Judicial Service Appointments
After hearing submissions from the parties, the Amicus Curiae, the Union of India, various High Courts and States, the Bench reserved judgment on the larger issues concerning judicial service recruitment, including the validity of the three-year practice requirement.
Appearances
Mr. Siddharth Bhatnagar, Sr. Adv. (A.C) Mr. Ankit Yadav, AOR Mr. Aditya Sidhra, Adv. Ms. Ananya Nair, Adv. Mr. Nadeem Afroz, Adv. Ms. Riya Shankar Sharma, Adv. Mr. Chinmayi Chatterjee, Adv. Mr. Chaitanya Sonkeria, Adv. Mr. Areeb Husain, Adv.

